Book Promo

Book promos are all the rage.
Why this should be escapes me. I suppose it is a moving-picture aid for  those who choose to judge a book by its cover. I suspect Book Promos are not employed by those who judge a book by, you know, the words inside of it. The ‘Look Inside’ feature of Amazon et al mean that we should all now be able to judge whether we want to read a book by reading a sample of it.

So why have I made my own book promo? I don’t know. To see if it will increase sales, I suppose. And because I’m looking for reasons to put off getting back down to my Lebanon Bookette.

The New York Times has an interesting article on book promos and a link to a very humorous book promo, or anti-promo, which also lampoons all of the other things writers are expected to do nowadays beyond actually writing.

Share

Dear John: Dear God

Finding myself in Le Defense last night, for reasons of I shall not go into, Mrs Blogosophy and I decided, on impulse, to go to the cinema. Having reached a certain age, and being of a certain temperament, we don’t often do things on impulse, but last night we did.
Unable to find our way to the Cineplex through the shopping centre, we had to get our bearings by venturing out into the ‘outside’.

Is it just me or does anyone else find shopping malls harder to navigate than the thickest jungle? There are no landmarks, nowhere to get your bearings — just shop after shop and all with nothing of interest in them. Shops, shops everywhere, and not a thing to buy. As always, these temples to conspicuous consumption robbed me my magnetic north and left me running, rat like, in frenetic and ever-decreasing circles.
I briefly considered asking directions, but these malls are inhabited by interlopers from another planet, the ubiquitous mall rats. They are easily spotted, attired to resemble gang members from Los Angeles, and their non-human status can be seen in the spasmodic movements of their flailing limbs, which my grandmother would have called ‘throwing shapes’. Even if they had spoken English, I would never have approached one, and with my poor command of gutter French, I judged such an encounter to be unwise.
So, to return, more or less, to the point, we went outside to look for the cinema. I remembered that it was near a large concrete tennis ball that is called a planetarium, but looks more like a mini nuclear reactor. Le Defense, I should point out to those of you who have mistook me for a war correspondent, is the futuristic Bladerunneresque part of Paris . It’s was what the future was meant to look like in the seventies, but rather than describe it, I’ll simply offer you a diversional hyperlink detour to a video I made of it a couple of years ago.
Anyway, to cut a long story shortish, we found the Cineplex and made our way to a snaky queue full of snaky people. They were young people, and worse than that, young people at the weekend. Fortunately, my grey hair confers on me the power of invisibility, and the youth left me in peace. I laboured in the queue for forty days and nights, or at least it felt as such, and I passed the time artfully reminding my long-suffering wife of how much I hated queuing.
This queuing experience was filled with added suspense this dark and rainy night. It was a twisting queue with a twist; a queuer’s queue. The film we wanted to see, Alice in Wonderland, only had 13 places left when we joined the line, and as the numbers slowly decreased and we shuffled along the mortal coil, we wondered if we would be one of the lucky ones to gain admittance. To pass the time, I regaled to wife to a witty allusion to the Pearly Gates, and the tragic-comedy of what might happen if Heaven had only a specific number of places for each day. It stunned her into silence, as so many of my witty allusions do.
Those who know my life, and the pathos that surrounds it, will not be surprised to find that I was turned away from the inn of Tim Buton, and the Alice did not wish to see me. The Wonderland was not going to grant me admittance.
Acting on impulse, in the spirit of the night, I bought two tickets for the film that was starting next. It was the nearest I’ve ever come to fulfilling a fantasy of mine of walking into a train station and buying a ticket for the next departing train and spending a year of my life in whatever destination it brought me to; and at the end of that year, repeating the same process; and so on and so on; so that my life would be spent as a homage to randomness.
But who has the balls for that kind of thing? Pas moi, that’s for sure. I was surprised I had bought tickets for a film I knew nothing about. Not so much as a poster had I seen, and the only information I had was the mysterious title, ‘Dear John’.
That should have been enough. I really should have known. Why did my brain switch itself off at that precise moment? My brain seems to do that a lot, actually, and I think it’s out to get me. Either that or it has a suppressed desire to wade through the worst kind of romantic comedy, slushy as the Moscow snows in April.
Thankfully the better parts of my mind would not allow the travesty of a chick flick to debase me and it sent me to the suicide of sleep at frequent intervals. I died eight times in that movie and would have missed it entirely but Mrs Blogosophy kept nudging me awake and warning me that I was snoring. This is unusual, because I normally don’t snore, but perhaps my larynx was trying to make as much noise as possible to block out the dialogue.
The plot, if such a word is appropriate, was the ubiquitous boy-meets-girl, problem arises, obstacle is overcome, happy ending. How many times can they make this movie? I knew from five minutes in what was going to happen and had to repress the desire to turn around and address the audience, like a movie messiah, hollering that this film was a repeat, that the ending was proscribed, that we should immediately demand they change the reels and offer us Alice in Wonderland instead.
However, in the insane world we live in, this kind of free speech is not considered appropriate, and instead I sat in silence, nodding in and out of the movie hell. Satre only believed that Hell was other people because he hadn’t kept waking up in this movie. Like a bear hibernating through its first zoo winter, I wondered if I would ever be free of it.
The protagonist, antagonist to my sleep, is the incongruously named Channing Tatum. I would make a joke about that name, but it’s funny enough in itself: Channing Tatum. What kind of drugs were his parents on? He is what I believe the average teenage girl would describe as a hunk and this is presumably why he was chosen for the role. It certainly could not be for his taciturn delivery and expressionless face.
And let’s face it, he looks good in a uniform — a real Action Man physique. Channing, or the ‘John’ of the title, is in the Special Forces, and travels the world’s hotspots giving candy to children and shooting their parents. His squad have equally large necks and broad shoulders, and he is torn between his loyalty to them and his love for the female lead.
Of course, that’s a no-contest win for the girl, so then 9-11 is thrown in, and we have love of one’s country versus the girl, and if that country is America, then the all-American hero just has to sign up for another two-year term, and deliver what to me was the only funny line in the film, “I’m going to extend.”
The actions of the plastercine beau, needless to say, peeves the female lead, Savannah, played by the woman with largest eyes in the world, Amanda Seyfried. Suffering the pangs of disprized love, she marries someone else, but we are later informed that this was only because he had cancer and his son was autistic –isn’t that always the way?

Tying this overcooked spaghetti together was the motif of epistolary love. After an initial two-week summer romance, the distant lovers commune through hundreds of heartfelt hand-written letters, since the American Special Forces don’t have internet and it hasn’t occurred to Amanda that she could write it on Word and then press print.
The film could have inadvertently raised an important issue here though. I mean, could the Americans current military problems be due in part to their lack of a satellite broadband connection? It could help them with the jihadists and as well as eliminate time lags for these star-crossed lovers.
However, it was nice to see the epistolary form rising from its eighteenth century ashes, and perhaps this bodes well for my latest moribund child, Letters from the Ministry, and its missive-writing protagonist, S Fox, who also eschews more modern forms of communication.
Plugs aside, this was a truly awful movie, and I needed several pints to help me forget it, which I shall be billing to Messers Tatum and Seyfriend.
“Dear John, I love you”: Dear God, please help me.

Share